All
| TITLE | Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Da22008 Decided July 19, 2018 ¡¼Indemnification¡½ [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| In a case where the ten-year extinctive prescription of a claim based on a final and conclusive judgment is nearing expiration, whether there exists benefit of re-instigating a suit for the interruption of prescription (affirmative), and whether in such case the court in which the subsequent suit was filed may re-examine whether all necessary requirements have been satisfied to assert such established right (negative) | |


