TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 99Ma7466 delivered on June 13, 2000 [full Text]
Summary
In case of an architectural design contract with divisible terms, where the relationship of architectural design contract between the contractor and owner is terminated after the design drawing, etc. has been completed and delivered to the owner, a substantial portion of the design fee has been paid and the construction work has progressed considerably, whether the right to use such design drawing, etc. is reserved to the owner (affirmative)

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 98Do3697 delivered on June 15, 2000
Next	Supreme Court Decision 97Nu19427 delivered on June 9, 2000